Study on the Helpfulness of Explainable Artificial Intelligence

cs.HCarXiv:2410.11896DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-63803-9_16

Tobias Labarta, Elizaveta Kulicheva, Ronja Froelian, Christian Geißler, Xenia Melman, Julian von Klitzing

Published October 14, 2024

Abstract

Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) is essential for building advanced machine learning-powered applications, especially in critical domains such as medical diagnostics or autonomous driving. Legal, business, and ethical requirements motivate using effective XAI, but the increasing number of different methods makes it challenging to pick the right ones. Further, as explanations are highly context-dependent, measuring the effectiveness of XAI methods without users can only reveal a limited amount of information, excluding human factors such as the ability to understand it. We propose to evaluate XAI methods via the user's ability to successfully perform a proxy task, designed such that a good performance is an indicator for the explanation to provide helpful information. In other words, we address the helpfulness of XAI for human decision-making. Further, a user study on state-of-the-art methods was conducted, showing differences in their ability to generate trust and skepticism and the ability to judge the rightfulness of an AI decision correctly. Based on the results, we highly recommend using and extending this approach for more objective-based human-centered user studies to measure XAI performance in an end-to-end fashion.

Author comment

World Conference on Explainable Artificial Intelligence

Read the PDF View on arXiv

Abstract

Author comment

More in cs.HC